News - September 2001


30th Sept '01

by Gerry Adams MP ( Reproduced from Sinn Fein site )

I want to begin my remarks by extending solidarity and condolences to the victims of the terrorist attacks in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania. This Ard Fheis, the first of the 21st century, takes place in the shadow of these outrages.

Ionsaí millteanach a bhí ann ar la millteanach do mhuintir na Stait Aontaithe chomh maith le muntir na tire seo.

In the week or so after these attacks, like many other people on this island, I spent several hours each night on the phone trying to get through to friends in New York and Washington, including our representative in the US, Rita O'Hare, to make sure they were safe, and to hear news of the extent of the tragedy. The enormity of this catastrophe for them is very personal. It is for me also.

Two years ago I visited the north tower of the World Trade Centre. Some Irish/American friends who are associated with Friends of Sinn Féin and who work at the World Trade Centre and in the Mercantile Exchange adjacent to it, had organised lunch in the Windows on the World restaurant.

The restaurant was at the top of the tower and gave a spectacular view of New York and New Jersey, of the Hudson river, of Ellis island and the Statue of Liberty. It was an impressive sight and our friends were clearly enormously proud of this engineering marvel where each day 50,000 people worked.

Sadly, tragically, one of those who organised our visit is now dead. Others we met that day or on other occasions, are dead also.

Many of us in the north of Ireland and here in Dublin have experienced the grief and hurt of loss during the years of our conflict. We understand the personal trauma that is now touching thousands of American homes, and homes in Ireland, in Britain and elsewhere in the world.

Our thoughts and prayers are with them at this terrible time and I have sent deepest condolences and sympathies on my own behalf and on your behalf to the people of the United States. I welcome the US Ambassador Richard Egan to this Ard Fheis and I welcome the President of the Friends of Sinn Féin in the USA, Mr. Larry Downes.

Of course seeing the Irish names on the list of the dead, particularly among the firefighters and the New York police reminds us of the close ties between us and America and of the millions of US citizens who proudly trace their roots to Ireland. The people of Ireland owe a huge debt of gratitude to the Irish American community, to Congress and to the US Administration who devoted time, energy and resources to help the peace process here.

Sinn Féin, in particular, has benefited from the generosity of Americans who want to bring about peace, justice, equality and a United Ireland. The support of Irish America has enabled us to bring about real change in Ireland. The back bone of our fund raising effort in the US is the construction industry and workers in New York. Many of them, who follow in the footsteps of `the Irish who built America' have suffered grievously in these atrocities. That is why we have endorsed the Friends of Sinn Féin recommendation to dedicate the proceeds of the annual November fundraiser in New York to the families of the construction workers who lost their lives.

It is right that we express solidarity and sympathy with the people in the USA and that we repudiate these atrocities. But we have to go further than these expressions of our sorrow, shock and denunciation.

Crisis in the Peace Process

Our own peace process is in a mess and it must now be obvious to everyone that the political institutions established under the Good Friday Agreement are going to collapse unless the unionists lift their threats and work with Sinn Féin and the other parties, as they committed themselves to do under the Agreement.

The institutions will collapse because unionists are refusing to administer them except on their own terms. They have prevented the all-Ireland institutions, and ironically the British-Irish Council from functioning. They have vetoed the work of the Minister of Education and the Minister of Health and now they are moving a motion to exclude Sinn Féin from the Executive. In my view all of this has been greatly influenced by the manner in which the British government approaches the process. That approach has been characterised by making all other issues secondary to the issue of IRA arms.

In other words the issue of IRA weapons has been made a precondition for progress on all other issues. This is in direct breach of the Good Friday Agreement. The British government may protest that this is not the case, or insofar as it is the case, that it arises from David Trimble's resignation and from the price which Mr. Trimble has put on the future stability of the political institutions. But this is not the whole truth. The whole truth is that resistance to change in the north of Ireland comes not only from those within unionism, but from within the British system also.

This goes back much further than the current crisis. Indeed, it has been an historic factor in every effort to deliver equality, justice, and peace.

In this phase, it goes back to the private assurances in the side-letter that Tony Blair gave to David Trimble hours after they had endorsed the Good Friday Agreement three and a half years ago. It is his government that is responsible for permitting a virus to enter and to remain at the heart of the Agreement.

The fault line in the Agreement, and of every crisis in it can be traced to that point. That letter showed a willingness on the part of the British government to pander to unionism and to create the space for Mr. Trimble to commence his effort to hollow out the Agreement.

For my part, I believe that the issue of arms can be resolved. We in Sinn Féin have done our best and enormous progress has been made in the past 6 years, particularly in relation to IRA arms.

But, as I have said many times, I do not believe that the issue of arms, all arms held by all armed groups, including those held by the British state forces, will be resolved on British government or unionist terms, or on the basis of threat, veto or ultimatum.

Some accuse Sinn Féin of being opposed to the decommissioning of arms and of not doing enough to achieve this. This is untrue.

In stark contrast to the continued use of loyalist and British weapons IRA guns are silent and the IRA cessations are now into their 8th year. The IRA has acknowledged that the issue of arms has to be dealt with as part of a conflict resolution process, and last year the IRA leadership set out a context in which it would put it's weapons verifiably beyond use.

In addition, as a confidence building measure it took the unprecedented initiative of agreeing with the two governments the appointment of two International Inspectors and allowing them to examine it's arms dumps to verify that their weapons have not been used.

Last month in a historic breakthrough the IICD announced that it had agreed a scheme with the IRA to put arms completely and verifiably beyond use. And the IRA is presently engaged in ongoing discussions with the IICD.

These are not small, unimportant events. No one who lived through the 70s, or 80s, or most of the 90s, or who has even as a cursory understanding of republican history and theology would ever have considered any of these things possible. These are huge developments, which, in the proper context, point the way to a future free of IRA weapons.

The Sinn Féin leadership helped to create the conditions that made this possible. We did so because of our commitment to a lasting and just peace settlement on this island.

The UUP response to this progress has been to ignore Sinn Féin's democratic mandate, the mandate of the other parties, the referendum, the Good Friday Agreement itself and their responsibilities and obligations.

The British government have not done much better.

Many republicans are angry at a Unionist leadership that frustrates, belittles and undermines this progress, while at the same time doing absolutely nothing to end the daily bomb and gun attacks by loyalists on catholic families.

They are angry at a British government which underpins the UUP position, in breach of the Agreement, and which has remilitarised nationalist and republican heartlands.

Universal Rights

This is a huge mistake. Republicans and nationalists want to be convinced that unionism is facing up to it's responsibilities. They want to believe that a British government wants to right wrongs and usher in a new dispensation based upon equality.

For the unionists to reject the IICD determination as they did and for the British government to suspend the institutions, as it has done, not once, not twice, but three times, is hardly the stuff of peace making.

The democratic rights and entitlements of nationalists and republicans cannot be conditional.

These rights are universal rights. They effect all citizens.

In the Good Friday Agreement these matters, that is policing, the political institutions, demilitarisation, human rights, the justice system and the equality agenda, are stand alone issues. These are issues to be resolved in their own right. They cannot be withheld or granted or subjected to a bartering process.

The Only Direction is Forward

So what does Sinn Féin do about all of this? Do our heads go down in frustration because at every point when it appears that progress is possible the unionists do something to make the process more difficult?

Do we stand on our dignity and our record and put it up to others to fulfil their duties and responsibilities?

Do we give way to righteous anger at the way a British government panders to a unionist veto?

Or do we resolve, despite all of this, or perhaps because of all of this, that Sinn Féin is going to continue to try to resolve this issue. The choice is clear.

This Ard Fheis meets at a time that is deeply somber, from any point of view. Whether you stand in Ardoyne, or America or Afghanistan reflecting on the peace process here or the massacre in Manhatten it is hard to avoid a foreboding about what lies ahead. Hope seems to sink and apprehension seems to grow, but we cannot afford to succumb to despair. For the true political activist the only choice is struggle not acquiesence. The only direction is forward.

Ní pairtí Sinn Féin a chuireann a dhroim leis na deaicreachtai. We are a party that has learned through decades of struggle, to deal with the objective reality in which our struggle finds itself.

But there is no easy way to sort out these issues and for my part I want to reiterate my total commitment to playing a leadership role in bringing a permanent end to political conflict on our island, including the end of physical force republicanism. I say this conscious of the dangers, risks, and history of such departures.

I have no illusions about any of this and I know my commitment is shared by the Sinn Féin leadership. From within the broad republican constituency we are working for the day when all the armed groups, including the IRA, cease to be. But we will not be part of any effort to criminalise or to deem as terrorists those men and women who fought when they considered they had no other choice and who had the integrity courage and wisdom to support a peace process when they had that choice.

Forgotten Ten

I want to welcome the steps being taken by the Irish government to re-inter the ten IRA Volunteers buried in Mountjoy jail and to urge people to attend their State funeral on October 14th in Dublin. Republicans have always remembered and commemorated with pride those who gave their lives so that future generations may live in better times.

Republicans continually look to the future and how best to achieve our goals but we also acknowledge that it was the sacrifice of previous generations that has brought us closer to the objectives of independence, justice and a lasting peace.

The forgotten ten played their part and we will commemorate their lives with pride.

Súineas sioraí do Kevin Barry, Thomas Whelan, Patrick Moran, Thomas Bryan, Patrick Doyle, Frank Flood, Bernard Ryan, Thomas Traynor, Patrick Maher and Edward Foley. I measc laochra na nGael go raibh siad.

We know the difference between a freedom fighter and a terrorist. And that the second can be an agent of a government and a foreign one at that. There are elements on this island who say there should be a repudiation of those who used force to win freedom and that Ireland should apologise for our patriots.

I am sure that even at this serious juncture America is not going to apologise for George Washington, who would expect them to, neither should the Irish nation apologise for Wolfe Tone, or Padraig Pearse or James Connolly, or Maire Drumm, or Mairead Farrell or Bobby Sands or Kevin Barry.

Building Political Strength

Many republicans and nationalists are disillusioned with the pace of progress and frustrated by the hypocrisy and cynicism of anti-Republican elements who have sought to use events of this summer to gang-up on Sinn Féin or to relaunch their anti-republican agenda. Following the arrest of three Irishmen in Columbia and the atrocities in the USA it was almost like the bad old days of vilification, demonisation and media disinformation once again. While loyalist paramilitaries threw over 250 bombs, while their murder campaign intensified on a daily basis, while young catholic school children were blockaded on their way to and from school, there was an unrelenting agenda to pressurise, marginalise and blame Sinn Féin for all of this. And the hypocrisy and opportunism wasn't limited to the usual anti-agreement elements in the British and unionist establishment. Others north and south clambered onto the anti-republican bandwagon.

Why was this so?

Could it be that what all these elements have in common is a fear of the growing strength of Sinn Féin. Could it be that many of those who railed against us in the old days - who were against the Hume/Adams initiative, who were for censorship - or could it be that in June of this year they saw their worst nightmare starting to become a reality, and seized upon other events in an unprincipled and opportunistic attempt to batter us and to unnerve our support? This will not be successful. I spoke here in Dublin, in March, at a special conference held in place of our Ard Fheis which was cancelled because of the foot and mouth crisis. At that conference I predicted that Sinn Féin would win more votes than ever before in the elections in the north. I said and I quote: `Despite the obvious intent by the SDLP of introducing Brid Rodgers as a spoiler into West Tyrone I am confident that when our Ard Fheis finally meets later this year it will be to welcome Pat Doherty as the MP for West Tyrone.' Failte Pat.

I want on to predict significant gains in North Belfast, Mid Ulster, Newry and Armagh, Foyle, and all other parts of the north.

I want to commend Comhairle na Se Chondae for the outstanding achievement of putting forward the biggest number ever of local government candidates and achieving significant breakthroughs everywhere. I want to commend them and the people for making Sinn Féin the largest nationalist party in the six counties.

In March I also pointed to the opportunities in the Nice Treaty referendum for Sinn Féin to mount vigorous opposition to that Treaty and to put forward our policy against an EU superstate and the loss of sovereignty. I want to commend all those who played such an important role in a vigorous public campaign to mobilise opinion for the defence in Europe of Irish democratic rights, not the erosion of them.

In the face of all elements of the Irish establishment, including the government itself and all the establishment parties, the people's voice was heard. When the votes were counted Sinn Féin's voice was with the majority for democracy, sovereignty and economic and social justice. The government and the establishment were defeated. The people won.

And finally, my friends in what was a deeply personal and emotional campaign for me we put it to the people of Fermanagh and south Tyrone that it would be a fitting tribute to Bobby Sands if they could elect Michelle Gildernew, as their MP and the first woman Sinn Féin MP since Countess Markievez. And the people answered a resounding yes.

We will see this growth continue in the months ahead. Nuair a theann an TD do Cabhan/Muineachan Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin ar ais go Teach Laighinn ní bheidh se ag siul isteach leis féin ach beidh daoine eile tofa mar TD ag Sinn Féin.

And it is in this movement forward, it is in this strengthening of Sinn Féin's position that will bring about real and lasting change.

All Ireland potential

Sinn Féin is the only meaningful and truly republican party on the island because we are the only party organised throughout the island which genuinely strives to give democratic voice to the sovereign people of the 32 counties.

• We are the only party that puts forward candidates in all elections held among the Irish people.

• We are the only party that has representatives elected to Westminster, to the Assembly, to the Dail, and to local authorities, north and south, and which sits in all but the first of these - for obvious reasons.

• We are the only party that nominates members of all-Ireland Implementation Bodies on both sides of the border.

• We are the only party which has the potential to have members of the all-Ireland Ministerial Council from both parts of this island.

• We are the only party which can influence membership from both Belfast and Dublin of the all-Ireland Joint Committee of the Human Rights Commissions.

• We are the only party which will be able to make an input to northern and southern membership of the 32-county Consultative Forum of Civil Society.

• We are the only party which will have participants from north and south in the Joint Parliamentary Forum.

• We are also seeking representation for northern MPs in the Dáil and full membership as of right for nominees of northern political parties in the Seanad.

• And we have campaigned for votes for citizens in the six counties in Presidential elections and relevant constitutional referenda.

Sinn Féin is the only all-Ireland party. Not just geographically, not just politically, not just strategically but also because we have a vision of a new future - a united, independent Ireland.

Ending inequality

The political landscape of Irish politics is changing and republicans in every corner of this island are at the forefront of that change. People are sickened by what they have seen from the Beef tribunal, through to the McCracken, Lindsay, Moriarty, and Flood Tribunals. Many politicians here make a genuine contribution to public service we seem to have a prevailing political ethos which is all about legitimatising a two-tier society.

You walk through the streets of our towns and cities and you can see young men and women sleeping in doorways. There are others who are less unfortunate and conspicuous, but are still among the excluded and deprived.

21% of Irish workers live on low incomes. This is the second highest proportion in the EU. The 26 Counties also has the second largest gap between rich and poor in the EU. The income inequalities in the Six Counties are just as pronounced.

A recent border education study found that there are 1.1 million people on the island who can be categorised as education poor, in that they had little or no formal educational qualifications and that 24% of the adult population north and south had literacy difficulties.

In a world where literacy and education are the key to a better and more fulfilling standard of living this is a shocking indictment of the society that has been built in Ireland, north and south.

The last official assessment of poverty showed over a third of persons falling below the 60% relative income poverty line. In the midst of plenty, it would be easy for society to forget those who have been left behind. But, while Sinn Féin exists, they will not be forgotten and they will not be abandoned. We must ensure that, for everybody, Ireland is a place in which to live and not to leave.

In the months ahead, and before we convene as an Ard Fheis, there are certain issues that we have to particularly address, under the headings of:

• Health care and provision;

• Crime and drugs;

• Housing; • Childcare;

• Education;

• Transport and

• The environment - with particular reference to waste disposal and proposed incineration. We have developed policies on all of these and we must continue to carry them to the people.

We need a coalition of all of those seeking an end to poverty, and inequality. We need a coalition across sectarian and racial divisions. We need a coalition of those in urban and rural communities who have been shut out of the increased prosperity of recent years. We need a coalition between republicans in the broadest sense and all those campaigning for real and lasting change in our country, including decent politicians of all parties. Tá polaitiócht na hÉireann ag athrú agus tá poblachtánaigh ó gach cuid den tír chun tosaigh san athrú sin.

Saoirse, fuascailt agus ag tabhairt cumacht don pobal príomh téamaí Shinn Féin.

Tá muid ag lorg níos mó ná saoirse polaitiúl ár dtír. Tá muid ag lorg saoirse soisialta agus eacnamaíochta na saoránaigh ar fad atá in Éirinn..

Ciallaíonn sin, saoirse ó smacht eachtranach, saoirse ó aineolas agus eagla, saoirse ó plá na ndrugaí, saoirse ó ranganna scoile plódaithe, ó scuainí oispidéil agus ó easpa tithíocht.

Sharing the Wealth in the island economy

The combined effects of Foot and Mouth and unease about the faltering global economy has had a significant impact on us all.

This makes it all the more important to take the steps across the island to create linkages and new structures that will rebuild an island economy and ensure that the Irish economy of the 21st century is one where everyone has access to a dignified standard of living, where they are employed in meaningful work, where they are housed adequately and educated in line with their needs, where health and other social services are delivered locally and with quality.

Most importantly we want to construct a society where people decide, plan and deliver these issues for themselves.

Sinn Féin wants to help build a society that rewards those people who actually make the profits, the goods and the wealth.

What we want to construct is a society where decision making is increasingly taken out of the hands of central government and placed in the hands of the communities to decide for themselves the sort of local economy that suits their needs.

Surely this would be better than the golden circle of corruption uncovered in Irish society over the past 10 years. A golden circle where decision making at a national and local level was something often bought by wealth and bribes by those who had the resources rather than by any real exercise of democratic decision making.

We want a decentralised Ireland where the east coast Dublin-Belfast power axis is replaced with regional government empowered to shape political and economic society.

To stop the decline of rural Ireland. To rebuild the depopulated communities. To bring much needed resources and investment to deprived areas rural and urban. To educate for good and eradicate the bad.

This requires political will and competence which is absent in the establishment political thinking of today.

It is Sinn Féin which has been spearheading the agenda for a just all Ireland economy through our efforts in Leinster House through the Assembly Committee on Trade and Investment through InterTrade Ireland and through our representatives in local government.

An example of this was the meeting in Sligo where the mayors of Derry and Sligo, along with the chairpersons of Cavan, Donegal, Fermanagh, Leitrim, Monaghan, Sligo and Strabane councils met and discussed the formulation of a common strategy to develop the eight North Western counties of Ireland.

Sinn Féin's Sean MacManus, Mayor of Sligo Corporation, was the catalyst for making this cross border conference on economic development happen.

Making Politics Work

This is the first Ard Fheis attended by Bairbre de Brun as Minister of Health and Martin McGuinness as Minister for Education.

Sinn Féin is responsible for two of the most difficult Ministries in the Executive. And I want to commend Bairbre and Martin for the remarkable job they have done in conditions which no other Minister in these islands has had to endure.

Inside and outside their departments they have won the praise and admiration of many people, including some who are not Sinn Féin supporters.

As part of Sinn Féin's drive to provide a more effective patient centred Health Service Bairbre de Brun has taken a range of initiatives designed to:

Improve the standard and efficiency of health care service delivery; and

Develop a strategic direction for health, social services and public safety which will deliver modern, effective, accessible services and commend public confidence.

Bairbre's initiaitives include:

• A review of acute hospital services

• Establishing a Social Care Council to improve protection of vulnerable patients and raise standards of practice

• The expansion of children and young people's services

• Placing the equality agenda at the heart of Health Care Service delivery

• Bringing forward strategies to reduced drug and alcohol related hardship and to reduce teenage pregnancies

• Increased the priority given to Health in the Executive's Programme for Government

• And she has led the debate for an all-Ireland health service

Tá sí tar éis bheith chun tosaigh ag úsáid an Ghaeilge ina rannóg, istigh san Assembly, áit a bhí uirthi cur suas le drochíde seicteach ó aondachtóirí.

Ba mhaith liom tacú le iarrachtaí Bairbre an Ghaeilge a chur chun cinn agus tá mé ag súil leis an lá a bheidh muid ar fad san Assembly agus ins na institiúidí eile ag déanamh ár ghnó chomh maith céanna tré Ghaeilge agus Béarla.

Molaim chomh maith na teachtaí (MLAs) eile ag Sinn Féin nach bhfuil líofa sa Ghaeilge ach atá ag lorg bealaí chun an Ghaeilge a chur chun cinn tré brú a chur ar an gcóras.

Martin as Minister for Education has made a real impact on the practice and development of Education in the north. This year alone we saw a massive 130 million investment in the schools infrastructure. That means 17 new schools for our children.

We also saw increased funding for a new trust fund to support Irish-medium education and he has initiated a fundamental review into the way schools are funded in order to ensure equality and fairness.

Martin has won the hearts and minds of large sections of the educational community by his straightforward, honest and thorough approach. Including many who would be our most trenchent opponents. Wherever he goes he builds up a warm rapport with the pupils and teachers.

He has ensured that there is regular interaction between Na Ranna Oideachais, between Belfast and Dublin. Four Education Working Groups were set up dealing with:-

Special needs;

Child protection;

Exchange programmes;

North-South teacher mobility to increase the mobility of teachers throughout the island of Ireland.

In the field of equality, like Bairbre, Martin has ensured that his department has an Equality Scheme and he has added an Equality Division to oversee the implementation of equality measures.

He has targeted social needs, aimed at distributing funds more fairly, and supported small rural primary schools. And he made clear his opposition to the 11+ and initiated a review of that unfair selection system.

I want to commend all our MLAs, those on Committees, as well as our Ministers. We have all been on a learning curve in terms of our input into the Executive, the Assembly and when they existed the all-Ireland institutions. I am satisfied thus far we have made a valuable and constructive contribution to decisions and developments at all levels. We have been extremely patient also in the face of provocation from unionism.


The cause of unionism is being disgraced daily on the Ardoyne Road, as it was previously at Harryville and Garvaghy Road. There is no excuse and no right to protest and blockade against children. The leaders of unionism need to make that clear. Sinn Féin has been working in North Belfast, not only to lower tensions but, while repudiating the protest, attempting also to deal with the fears of unionists in that part of Belfast city.

I want to assure unionists that we will have no truck with sectarianism of any kind whether or from any source. Irish republicanism is against sectarianism. Everyone should have the right to live, to shop, to work, to travel, to be educated, or entertained wherever they wish free from sectarian harassment of any kind.

We want to reach out to unionists. For republicans they are in the culture of everyday life, no less Irish than the rest of us. However if they or some of them, to one degree or another, do not choose to look at it in that way that is their entitlement.

They should not be compelled into acknowledging what they do not want to, and we accept that narrow green conservatism has contributed at times to their sense of alienation from the community of Ireland which we desire them to embrace.

And we recognise that in looking to Britain some of unionist think, not so much of Empire, but the traditions of the Reformation and the democratic struggle in England against absolutist monarchy. Both of which should be accorded the deepest respects.

Unionism overall is locked into a leadership battle which is being fought out around the Good Friday Agreement and the changes which that Agreement involves. There is resistance to these changes and unionist no leadership has yet to emerge to actively and consistently promote an acceptance of them.

Despite this a lot of progress has been made and our difficulties and our differences in many ways have been put in context by what is happening in other parts of the world. And I am sure that our horror at recent events is shared by the unionist family.

Our collective responsibility at this time is to settle our differences and I appeal to the leaders of unionism to join with us in doing that so that all sections of our people can go forward on the basis of equality.

John Hume and the SDLP

I want to pay tribute to SDLP leader John Hume. His resignation as party leader and that of his Deputy Leader Seamus Mallon marks the end of an era.

They and we have a different analysis and different objectives.

But it is to John Hume's credit that he responded to the invitation from Sinn Féin to dialogue with our party in the late 1980's and reached out to work with us in trying to find a peaceful resolution of the causes of conflict on this island and between Britain and Ireland.

He was vilified, of course, including by some within his own party. But in a short period the Hume/Adams dialogue, as it became known opened up the possibility of a new beginning. This gave all our people hope and led an agreement which was endorsed by rank and file unionists as well as nationalists and republicans.

That period of hope is often forgotten now as the peace process stumbles from one crisis to another. But that hope should be a lasting tribute to the finest hour of John Hume.

I extend to John and Pat and to Seamus Mallon and his wife Gertrude my warmest best wishes for the future.

I look forward to working with this new leadership of the SDLP. Sinn Féin and the SDLP represent a shared constituency which has come through too much and endured too many indignities to settle for anything less than equality and justice.

The new generation of leaders seeking to take up the mantle of John Hume have a choice to make as momentous as that made by John Hume when he joined with me in a search for genuine resolution of this conflict.

The SDLP can play a vital role in delivering peace or it can retreat into `post nationalist' fallacies and fantasies and a narrower, more negative agenda. The decision is for them to take but I have to say that their move, taken in the final days of John Hume's leadership, to endorse the revamped RUC which falls short of the basic Patten requirement, and does not augur well for the future.

To support a failed police force when our shared constituency cries out for a new policing service is to attempt to impose an inequitable solution on a people who demand equalit Let me make it clear that Sinn Féin will not acquiesce to or be neutral about the need for a new beginning to policing. We are committed to continue the work to bring this about and to reject anything less than what people are entitled to.

I appeal to the new leadership of the SDLP to join again with us and others who seek an end to the causes of conflict on these islands. This will require courage and it will require sacrifice but we owe this to our shared constituency and to the rest of the people of this island.

However, I am very conscious that there is a section of the SDLP which is virulently and obsessively opposed to us. The only thing that keeps it going is looking over its shoulder at Sinn Féin. The problem is that it does not therefore see the future coming and is likely to bump into it, with even more unpleasant electoral consequences in the time to come.

So, whether John Hume's vision survives within his party depends on whether this tendency comes into the ascendancy in the party leadership in the time ahead. These are all issues for the SDLP to sort out for themselves but people in the six counties will watch that space to discover if the SDLP is more about initials than ideas. Whether the vision is limited by an artificial border or whether it can grow to meet the challenges of the future.

International Situation

Before I deal with the international situation I want to call on all political parties in Ireland to sign an anti-racist pledge and make a commitment that they will not play party politics with the race issue and that they will not tolerate racism in any form in their party.

Furthermore we are calling for all of those asylum seekers who arrived in Ireland before January 1st 2001 to be granted an amnesty and for the government to take a more humane attitude to the issue of asylum seekers and refugees in general.

Sinn Féin has consistently argued that the United Nations is the international institution with the responsibility to prevent armed conflict and to protect civilians. While nations have an individual right to defend themselves and their citizens we agree with Kofi Annan UN Secretary General that only the United Nations can give global legitimacy to the struggle to eliminate terrorism.

Terrorism is ethically indefensible. Those responsible for the atrocities in the United States must be brought to justice.

What happened in New York and Washington and Pennyslvennia was, as the UN Human Rights Commissioner and former Irish President Mary Robinson said; `A crime against humanity.'

Progressive struggles throughout the world have been set back by the attacks in the USA. There is no excuse, no justification for those type of actions. But neither should anyone who is truly concerned with world peace be deflected from that task or be carried away by the notion of a clash between civilisations. The real challenge is for dialogue, not retribution. That is the lesson of the peace process on this island. That is what Sinn Féin is about. It is about standing up for your rights while recognising the rights of others. It is about dialogue. It is about being inclusive. It is about equality. It is about justice. It is about righting wrongs.

• It is wrong that anyone should have to suffer because of their nationality, their colour, or their creed.

• It is wrong that the third world should be crippled with debt while the first world is affluent.

•It is wrong that an elite group of less than a billion people control more than 80% of the world's wealth.

It is wrong that 1.2 billion of the world's people live on less than one dollar a day.

• It is wrong that armaments production and sales exceed by over 60 times the World Health Organisation's annual expenditure on the world's four main preventable diseases.

It is wrong that 11 million children under 5 die each year from preventable causes. This is equivalent to 30,000 children a day

• It is wrong that at least one million civilians, half of them children have died in Iraq as a result of the embargo imposed by the US and Britain.

• It is wrong that the British government sells weapons to Israel.

• It is wrong that the middle east conflict has been allowed to endure for so long and that the people of Palestine have to endure illegal occupation by Israel.

• It is wrong that our environment and the protection of this planet, the protection of nature, has been destroyed at the whim of big business

• It is wrong that 5.3 million people in Afghanistan - that's the population of our island - are on the brink of starvation as the result of a three year drought, in what the UN has described as the world's worst humanitarian crisis.

• It is wrong that justice has not been brought to the various long standing conflicts that have troubled this planet for a very long time.

The Irish government takes responsibility for the Chair of the UN Security Council for a month. None of these great wrongs can be righted in that time, but we look to the Foreign Minister Brian Cowan to send a very clear message to the world, on behalf of the people of this island that now is the time to strengthen bonds between people.

It is time to strengthen and extend democratic international institutions.

This year has been proclaimed by the General Assembly of the UN as the Year of Dialogue among Civilisations. It is of the utmost importance that this dialogue takes place and that those of us who live in the west come to learn that we are not the world - we are only a part of it.

We need to build peace, freedom, human rights, tolerance and promote the idea of a international society based upon the rule of law, on justice and equality - a truly united human family.

The 1981 Hunger Strikes remembered

As you all know this year marks the 20th anniversary of the 1981 hunger strike.

I want to commend everyone who established and participated in the 1981 committees, and who sought to celebrate the lives of the hunger strikers.

A few months ago I had the opportunity to bring a small number of people, most of whom had played a part in that desperate struggle 20 years ago, to visit Long Kesh.

It was an emotional visit for all of us and it brought back to my mind my visit to the prison hospital on July 29th 1981 along with Owen Carron and Seamus Ruddy of the IRSP.

By this time Bobby, Francie, Raymond, Patsy, Martin and Joe were dead.

We met Thomas McElwee, Laurence McKeown, Matt Devlin, Pat McGeown, Paddy Quinn and Mickey Devine and Bik McFarlane in the prison hospital They all looked rough, prison-pale skin stretched across young skull-like faces, legs and arms indescribably thin, eyes with that penetrating look that I had often noticed among fellow prisoners in the past, and that Bobby Sands had described as ``that awful stare, of the pierced or glazed eyes, the tell-tale sign of the rigours of torture.''

As they smiled across the table at us, all my fears and apprehension vanished. Big Tom offered me a jug of water.

`` Ar mhaith leat deoch uisce?''

`` Ba mhaith,'' arsa mise

`` Lean ar aghaidh, ta a lan uisce san ait seo,'' arsa se.

We were left alone and began to discuss the hunger strike, the campaign outside, the British government's position and the hunger strikers' personal attitudes to events.

We outlined the situation to them. The lads were fully aware of all developments, but we persisted in detailing in a factual and harsh manner everything that had happened over the past few weeks. They sat quietly, smoking or sipping water, listening intently to what we had to say.

They were all crystal clear in their attitudes. There was no basis for a settlement.

The British government were still persisting in their refusal to move meaningfully on work, association, or segregation. Yes, they knew they could come off the hunger strike at any time. Yes, they knew that there would be no difficulties in explaining the end of the hunger strike. If there was an alternative to the strike, they told us they wouldn't be on it. Five years of protest was too much. A reasonable and common-sense approach by the British would end, permanently, all the prison protests.

They knew the score; they didn't want to die, but they needed a settlement of the issues that caused the hunger strike before they would end their fasts. No, they were not driven by a personal loyalty to each other.

Regardless of what the others chose to do, each was personally committed to the five demands and to the hunger strike. They were not under any duress.

I painted the darkest and blackest picture possible: ``You could all be dead,'' I said. ``Everyone left in this room when we leave will be dead.''

``Sin é,'' said somebody. ``They won't break us. If we don't get the five demands, then the rest of the boys and the women will.''

``We're right,'' declared another. ``The British government is wrong and if they think they can break us they're wrong twice. Lean ar aghaidh.''

Bik arranged for us to go and see Kieran Doherty.

Doc was propped up on one elbow on his prison bed: his eyes, unseeing, scanned the cell as he heard us entering.

``Mise atá ann,'' said Brendan McFarlane.

``Ahh Bik, cad é mar atá tú?'' arsa Doc.

``Nílim romh dhona, agus tú féin?''

``Tá mé go hiontach; tá daoine eile anseo? Cé_?''

``Tá Gerry Adams, Owen Carron agus Seamus Ruddy anseo. Teastaíonn uatha caint leat.''

``Gerry A', fáilte.'' He greeted us all, his eyes following our voices. We crowded around the bed, the cell much too small for four visitors. I sat on the side of the bed. Doc, whom I hadn't seen in years, looked massive in his gauntness, as his eyes, fierce in their quiet defiance, scanned my face.

I spoke to him quietly and slowly, somewhat awed by the man's dignity and resolve and by the enormity of our mission.

He responded to my probing with patience.

``You know the score yourself,'' he said. ``I've a week in me yet.

How is Kevin (Lynch) holding out?''

``You'll both be dead soon. I can go out now, Doc, and announce that it's over.''

He paused momentarily and reflected, then: ``We haven't got our five demands and that's the only way I'm coming off. Too much suffered for too long, too many good men dead. Thatcher can't break us. Lean ar aghaidh. I'm not a criminal.''

I continued with my probing. Doc responded.

``For too long our people have been broken. The Free Staters, the church, the SDLP. We won't be broken. We'll get our five demands. If I'm dead well, the others will have them. I don't want to die, but that's up to the Brits. They think they can break us. Well they can't.'' He grinned self-consciously. ``Tiocfaidh ár lá.'' (``Our day will come.'')

``Thanks for coming in, I'm glad we had that wee yarn. Tell everyone, all the lads, all the women, I was asking for them and `` He gripped my hand.

``Don't worry, we'll get our five demands. We'll break Thatcher. Lean ar aghaidh.''

Outside Doc's cell, the screw led us in to speak to Kieran's father, Alfie, and his brother, Michael, who had just arrived to relieve Kieran's mother.

We spoke for about five minutes. I felt an immense solidarity with the Doherty family, broken-hearted, like all the families, as they watched Kieran die. Yet because they understood their son, they were prepared to accept his wishes and were completely committed to the five demands for which he was fasting.

Talking to Alfie, his eyes brimming with unshed tears, in the quiet cells in the H-Blocks of Long Kesh, I felt a raw hatred for the injustice that created this crisis.

I never saw Thomas McElwee, Mickey Devine, Kevin Lynch or Big Doc alive again.

How do you explain the Hunger strikes? How do you come to terms with what happened? It can be understood only if we appreciate the incorruptibility and unselfishness and generosity of the human spirit when that spirit is motivated by an ideal or an objective which is greater than itself. People are not born as heroes. The hunger strikers were ordinary people who in extraordinary circumstances brought our struggle to a moral platform which became a battle between them and the entire might of the British state.

One of the greatest achievements of the hunger strikers was that they set a moral standard for the conduct of struggle. I'm sure that this was not their intention but it is a fact. Their generosity commitment, idealism and unselfishness set an example for the rest of us to follow.

We Irish, all 70 million of us across this globe are no petty people.

If our opponents, if our detractors, if our enemies want to understand us, if they want to understand our struggle, if they want to understand our commitment and our vision for the future, then let them come to understand the hunger strikers.

For the rest of us there is peace to be made, elections to be fought and freedom to be won.

As Brendan McFarlane sings in his song

We're stronger now
You showed us how
Freedom's fight can be won
If we all stand as one

Comrades, let us stand together and move forward together as one. Ar aghaigh linn.

Sinn Féin Press Office, 44 Parnell Square, Dublin 1


21st Sept '01

Extracts from an article in the New York Times by Frank Rich, published in the Guardian

We live in a different America today than we did only the day before Tuesday.

Yes, as it is incanted hourly, we have lost our untroubled freedom of movement that we consider a birthright. We have lost our illusion of impregnability. But beneath those visceral imperatives an entire culture has been transformed. The nightmare, it is now clear, has awakened us from a frivolous if not decadent decade-long dream, even as it dumps us into an uncertain future we had never bargained for.

The dream was simple - that we could have it all without having to pay any price, and that national suffering of almost any kind could be domesticated into an experience of virtual terror akin to a theme park ride. The first part of that dream had already started to collapse with the fall of the stock market, the rise in unemployment and the evaporation of the surplus, well before terrorists achieved the annihilation of the most commanding edifice of American capitalism...

That fat, daydreaming America is gone now, as spent as the tax rebate checks, as forgotten as the 2000 campaign's debate over prescription drug plans, as bankrupt as our fantasies of instant millions, as vaporised as the faith that hi-tech surveillance and weaponry would keep us safe. The America that saw Disney's Pearl Harbour is as far removed from the America that was attacked on Tuesday as the America that listened to Orson Welles's War of the Worlds was from the America attacked at Pearl Harbour. "Instead of the next big thing being some new technological innovation or medical breakthrough," wrote David Rieff of our post-Tuesday nation in the Los Angeles Times this week, "the next big thing is likely to be fear". For the America that is gone, the America that could have it all and feel no pain beyond that on cable TV, George Bush was the perfect president. We could have a big tax cut (or at least some of us could) along with increases in spending for better schools and defence - and all without having to dip into the social security stash. We could lick our energy crisis while still guzzling gas. Faith-based institutions would take care of the poor and unfortunate. No serviceman would have to spend any more time in harm's way than Mr Bush (or most political leaders of his generation, regardless of party) did during Vietnam...

The country is rooting for Mr Bush, as it must. We need him to become the president of the America we have now. This means in part a u-turn in style - more face time with his fellow citizens, less scripted rhetoric from the alliterative phrasemakers who stick pretty words in his mouth (as they did Tuesday night) that sound as if they were written by the same glib stylists who gave him "home to the heartland" and "communities of character."

But style is the easy part. What is more pressing are changes in content. Many of his administration's previous policies are either irrelevant or contrary to a war-bound nation's interests. Education and tax cuts are no longer our top priority. The unilateralism the administration has practised in walking away from the Kyoto accord on global warming and the ABM treaty is anathema to the building of an international coalition to fight a war. Decisions that are "the most profound of our time" (as his handlers described his stem-cell verdict) can no longer be dragged out with weeks of self-aggrandizing spin.

But most of all, Mr Bush will have to prepare the nation for something many living Americans, him included, have never had to muster: sacrifice. In his pronouncements thus far, the president has expressed sorrow and vowed to "whip" evil, but surely he will soon have to prepare Americans to give up far more in wartime than kerbside check-in at the airport. Anyone who lives in New York has seen this week how many Americans are prepared to do this. That is the example our mayor and governor set, and it is the example thousands of New Yorkers have followed with open hearts.

Though polls show that we overwhelmingly support the idea of going to war, they do not indicate whether we understand that idea. The killers who attacked us on Tuesday had an all too ruthless eye for appraising how little we knew on Monday.

We have no choice now but, as a horror-struck Hamlet said after being visited by the ghost, to "wipe away all trivial fond records" from the table of memory, and hope that our learning curve will be steep.


20th Sept '01

First of all we wish to extend our sympathy to the people of the United States and especially to the families and friends of the victims of the deplorable attacks in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.

On 8 August we confirmed that the IRA leadership had agreed a scheme with the Independent International Commission on Decommissioning (IICD) to put IRA arms completely and verifiably beyond use.

This unprecedented IRA initiative was the result of lengthy discussions with the IICD over a long period.

It was another expression of our willingness to enhance the peace process and it involved considerable problems for us and for our organisation.

Peace making and peace keeping is a collective effort.

The IRA leadership's ability to speedily and substantially progress the decision was completely undermined by the setting of further preconditions and the outright rejection of the IICD statement by the Ulster Unionist Party leadership.

Subsequent actions by the British government including a continued failure to fulfil its commitments, remove the conditions necessary for progress.

On 14 August we withdrew our proposal.

However, as an earnest of our willingness to resolve the issue of arms, the IRA leadership wish to confirm that our representative will intensify the engagement with the IICD.

This dialogue is within the context of our commitment to deal satisfactorily with the question of arms.

It is with a view to accelerating progress towards the comprehensive resolution of this issue.

Progress will be directly influenced by the attitude of other parties to the peace process, including and especially, the British government.

The IRA's commitment is without question. However, as we have said before, peace making and peace keeping is a collective effort.

It is our considered view that the Irish peace process can succeed.

The continued failure or refusal to sustain the political process and to deliver real and meaningful change has a direct bearing on how this will be accomplished.

The IRA has contributed consistently and in a meaningful way to the creation of a climate which would facilitate the search for a durable settlement.

We will continue to do so, including through our engagement with the IICD, particularly at this difficult time, and in the period immediately ahead.

We also wish to state our attitude to the arrests of three Irishmen in Colombia.

There has been a lot of ill-founded and mischievous speculation about these arrests and some ill-considered and aggressive comment directed at our organisation.

We wish to make it clear that the Army Council sent no one to Colombia to train or to engage in any military cooperation with any group.

The IRA has not interfered in the internal affairs of Colombia and will not so do.

The IRA is not a threat to the peace process in Ireland or in Colombia. The three men have asserted their support for the process and we accept that.

P O'Neill


15th Sept '01

There is a scene in Godfather Two where Michael Corleone, on a visit to Batista’s Cuba with a view to sanctioning large scale mob investment there, witnesses a man deliberately sacrifice himself by secreting a bomb on his person in order to kill a carload of policemen. Horrified at what such fanaticism might mean for business, all plans in regard to investment in Cuba were instantly cancelled. After all, if people are willingly prepared to give up their own lives for some cause or other who do you threaten them with?

This is the situation America now faces. In all the hand wringing after September 11 this crucial dimension has by and large been ignored. Instead we have spokesmen tell of the ‘cowardly’ perpetrators who can ‘run but cannot hide’. Experience shows that they can and do. Except that on this occasion the hands-on bombers are already dead. Not just one nut or two, but at least four highly organised, highly skilled, not to say highly motivated teams of assassins. What motivated them? How many more are there? Is this the end or the beginning of the campaign to make Uncle Sam cry uncle?

So far these questions have not been seriously addressed; considerations at present seemingly for wimps only. America according to its President is going to war. He is assembling the world to ‘kick ass’. Whose ass is moot. But as George Bush seems to think it is a matter of rooting out these ‘folks’, raising a posse is after all the first thing a man does in such circumstances. Get a posse and hunt them down, or bomb them flat. But what if the ‘them’ is Afghanistan? Well, America could cite Cambodia as a precedent. Of course the slaughter from the air of an innocent country against which America was not at war, but deemed to be harbouring terrorists, did not help America defeat the Viet Cong, but it didn’t do it any harm either. Cambodia did not, and could not reply in kind. Had they been capable of doing so would such barbarity have been considered even at a time when America was prepared to shed a little blood for the cause?

In the coming days it will dawn on many that the outright expressions of support for America in the immediate aftermath of the demolition of the World Trade Centre may have been a little hasty. Diplomacy may have demanded it, not withstanding American body language suggests blood sacrifice on an enormous scale. What would be a proportionate response to the deaths of 20,000 Americans? 200,000? 2,000,000?

Put another away how many innocents will America have to obliterate to a) teach the rag-heads a lesson and b) prevent it happening again?

It is the second question that American strategists will be most concerned with. For the fact is that the question of revenge and prevention are, as is so often the case, in conflict. If America satisfies itself in regard to a, then it has to understand all considerations with regard to b must be dismissed. For the greater the apocalypse visited, the more savage ultimately will be the response. Fine if its Cambodia, Panama or Grenada. But this time they are not dealing with a nation state. They are confronting a mass of people who regard America as the source of all their woes. Punish them all? How? Many of the most desperate are already living in near stone-age conditions. If the threat is to bomb say Afghanistan ‘into the Dark Ages’ as was made against Iraq, then America should be aware that the Russians and the Taliban have beaten them to it. In addition suicide-bombers are hardly novel in the region. So despairing are many of these volunteers that the act of martyrdom seemingly supersedes the desire to kill the enemy in any significant numbers. Not so the Trade Centre operatives. This was something more than a personal gesture. This was intended to hurt. And it did. Make no mistake about it America has been wounded. For the first time in its history it knows the sheer awe that follows large-scale civilian destruction. This time it is Americans who are the victims of ‘collateral damage’. All America is now painfully aware that politics matters, that what its leaders do over there will have an impact over here. They know it and so do America’s enemy’s. America is no longer immune. A whole new ball game as they say.

The response we are told is that Americans, who in Balkans dropped bombs from 15,000 feet in order to avoid any military casualties whatsoever, now want blood. More pertinently, they are prepared to lose some to shed some. Get the bastards and to hell with the consequences is the current mood, or so we are informed. A far cry from when a few mobile phone threats from Osama Bin Laden had prompted President Bush to withdraw the FBI from Yemen, a US Marine contingent from Jordan and the US fifth fleet from its home base in the Gulf.

On top of that the reason the security services had no inkling of any such attack is because the CIA amazingly, has no operatives of any sort in the region. Understandably, talking tough and hanging out in Langley West Virginia is more attractive than penetrating the followers of Bin Laden and living thereafter a life, for as long as it lasts, dominated by diarrohea.

And if such lack of resolve has certainly emboldened fundamentalism, imagine what September 11 has done. Not to mention the performance of President Bush the leader of the ‘civilised’ world. As soon as news reached him, his immediate concern was for his own safety. He fled, hiding out in Nebraska and not even daring to surface until the coast was clear. This apparently is not a man to whom it is necessary to stress the word caution. Yet the influential New York Times did so anyway urging the President to avoid at all costs any entanglement with Afghanistan, a country who for centuries, it warned, has been the “battleground and graveyard for the interests of great powers.” America’s ‘interests’ rather than pride, or its people, has long been America’s governing philosophy.

Thus literally before the dust settles, government policy will already have rejected the ‘make my day’ promptings of the Dirty Harry’s for the more pragmatic realpolitik of that other great American icon Michael Corleone. Which means that if there is any dramatic change in foreign policy it is far more likely to be in a political rather than military sphere. If so, it is not Afghanistan but Israel who should be worried.


10th Sept '01

Reproduced from Anti-Fascist Action

It is unlikely that many activists in AFA will be too surprised or even bothered at being likened to the "left wing of the Nazi Party" as Ian Donovan does in the Weekly Worker (30/8/01). Virtually every time AFA has physically beaten the fascists over the years the middle class Left have shrieked 'you're as bad as them!', now the hysteria has simply moved into the political arena. (Significantly AFA has never got this kind of reaction from a working class audience.)

What is surprising is Donovan's assertion that the alternative to AFA's "reactionary" arguments was the recent demonstration held in Sighthill on 25th August. The demonstration was called in the aftermath of the murder of a refugee, Firsat Yildiz, under the banner 'Sighthill The Way Forward - Unity Against Racism & Poverty'. Not only did the demonstration call for improved facilities for the estate, but specifically demanded "the right to be listened to and consulted with before decisions are made for the area".

The fact that the demonstration acknowledged the grievances of both the refugees and the local community was very important - and something AFA has argued for the last two years. In May 2000 AFA warned: "A failure to demand adequate resources along with the rights of refugees can only, as in many communities in Britain, pit the most wretched against the most disadvantaged." (AFA News.)

The Sighthill demonstration illustrates that some sections of the Left have abandoned the divisive 'Refugees Welcome Here' approach and adopted a more progressive working class strategy. In July 2000 AFA argued that "the way to undermine the racists is to bring class into the equation and support the rights of local communities and the refugees." (Fighting Talk 24.)

So while Mr Donovan applauds the Sighthill demonstration he urges people to "distance ourselves decisively" from AFA - the very people who, as we have shown, were the first to suggest this was the way forward.

Some confusion here...